Skip to main content

Charity: What, Why, and How

 

Image shows a person wearing a check shirt holding out a white cardboard box with a lid; there is a slit cut into the lid of the box, on the top, and the word DONATE is printed in blue on the front of the box.

The Productive Pessimist's working practice is to ask 5 questions of clients whom we're helping to address strategic, systemic, and crisis challenges in their focus remits.

5 questions. No more, no less.

Asking so few questions compels everyone in the room to focus on the "real problems", and set aside their personality clashes, their fixations, their personal perceptions of "the problem", and come together to bring through meaningful responses.

The business community, once they finally accept they do have problems, engage quite well with the challenge.

The charitable sector, however... I'd like to say the non-profit sector doesn't even accept they have any problems, because that would at least be reasonable, and make a lot more sense than the real situation, which is that the voluntary sector does nothing other than complain about all the "problems" it has.  And yes, many of those problems are genuine, and valid.  But, despite all the complaints and noise from charities about the problems they have, the sector is aggressively resistant to the idea of considering new ways of looking at and addressing their problems.

For charities, the "solution" is: people need to give us more money!
Sometimes, this varies:
"There are funding organisations who are keeping money from charities!!" - many of those funders are obliged, by their governance structure, to comply with an initial endowment grant made with an assumption of the organisation "existing in perpetuity."  In. Perpetuity. That's way beyond government 5yr terms. It's way beyond 10yr plans. It's way beyond even the most ambitious business plan.

When you understand the concept of "in perpetuity", you should begin to realise why funders who intend or obliged to exist "in perpetuity" genuinely can't "just give" you all their money, however worthwhile, necessary, and socially valuable your proposed projects are.  Human beings can't really conceive of "in perpetuity", so we'll be lazy, and reduce it to 100 years.  There are humans living a little longer than that, in increasing numbers.

If one project a day, requiring "just" Ā£20,000, came before a funding organisation, that's 365 projects a year, at a cost of Ā£7.3million in just one year.

Even if there were only one project a week going forward, with a cost of "just" Ā£10,000 - 7 times fewer projects, and half the cost - that's still Ā£520,000 in one year.  Over the 100 years we're talking about - the very beginning of the concept of "in perpetuity" - that's Ā£52million.

Let's reduce it even further; there's just one project a month, and it "only" needs Ā£5,000 of funding; over 100 years, that's Ā£6million.

Are you starting to see why organisations, even those who seem to have "loads of funds just sitting there!" can't support every charity and every project that comes to them if they intend, or are obliged to exist in perpetuity?

So What Questions Would We Ask the Charity Sector?

1. What is your purpose?
- Not "what are you doing?", not "what problem/s are you trying to solve?", not "who are you supporting?", not "what have you achieved?" - what is your purpose?

Your "purpose" isn't your day to day.
Your "purpose" isn't your five year plan.
Your "purpose" isn't your vision statement.

For example, our purpose at The Productive Pessimist Ltd is:

"To ensure that business and community leaders recognise all forms of talent, wherever they see it, whatever it looks like, and however it communicates its potential, and, through this vision, and the responses it demands, are ready to move quickly to act with purpose and relevance."

That's what "purpose" looks like.

2. What's getting in the way of you achieving your purpose?
- This is often the liveliest element of our work with organisations and leaders, and the part we dedicate the most time to; it takes a while to get people to move from individual annoyances to coming together to dig down to the "real problems", the actual barriers, rather than the trivial inconveniences.

The responses to this question will be deeply individual, but we often see similarities across sectors; it's very rare for every organisation within a sector to be facing unique barriers.

3. Why haven't you made the progress you most want to?
This is distinct from the barriers to achieving your purpose, and steps things down from the "mile high big picture" view to the ground-level, day to day view.

4. How are you preparing for a future of further, different challenges?

5. Other than "provide more people/money", how could someone in possession of a "magic wand", able to solve one problem, best help you to move significantly forward within your purpose?
Resources are outside your control.
That's a hard reality for many people to hear, but it's a necessary reality.

Resources are perceived as the solution to most peoples' problems, but they're not.  
Resources will only come once you have started working on the barriers to you pursuing your purpose.

You have to act without resources first.

And that's a deeply uncomfortable truth.

The voluntary sector doesn't like to hear truths, especially not those truths which involve "You can't just keep holding out your hand and stamping your feet."

So, what are charities to do if they have to act without resources?

Again, The Productive Pessimist's practice is to limit our suggestions to between 3-5. Any more than five, and it starts to feel overwhelming, any less than three, and it feels like something an organisation could have come up with themselves.

We'll offer three suggestions here; reach out to us by email for support and guidance around enacting these suggestions: theproductivepessimist@yahoo.com

. Work with other organisations who share your purpose; collaborate, don't compete.  Replicating effort in a world which is increasingly facing "attention-poverty" and "compassion fatigue" is always going to be a zero-sum game.

. Explore ways to reliably bring in your own income to support the work towards your purpose.

. Align with businesses in the for-profit sector who share elements of your purpose, for mutual benefit, not simply "as sponsors."

We have availability to provide a 3hr workshop with non-profits, for just Ā£120 - which is a one-off payment, with no additional obligations, on the following dates in April/May for remote engagement:

. Monday 14th April - flexible start time between 9am-4pm 
(allow 3hrs for workshop)
. Tuesday 15th April - flexible start time between 9am-4pm
. Tuesday 22nd April - flexible start time between 9am-4pm
. Wednesday 23rd April - flexible start time between 9am-4pm
. Monday 28th April - flexible start time between 9am-4pm

To book your support, email theproductivepessimist@yahoo.com; payment is due upfront at time of booking.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When 'Car Free Sunday' is Everyday

  One of the  services  we offer at The Productive Pessimist is public speaking, remotely or in person, both as sole speaker and as panel members. One of the topics we offer public speaking on is that of living car free.  This topic is covered in depth by myself - Ash  - and centred in the 20yrs I have been obliged to spend living car free, with half that time spent living in small villages in rural Norfolk , travelling up to 40miles each way for work, in full time employment. How It Started When I was 19, I took my third - and, as it turned out, final - driving test. I failed, and in such a way that I was referred for a fitness to drive sight test. I failed this, as well, with the commentary that my peripheral vision was very limited, and I therefore wasn't considered safe to drive. When I'd failed the driving test, I had a severe panic attack, and expressed to my instructor that "My parents are going to kill me" - I paid for my driving lessons , but my Dad pai...

It's Not "Worklessness" or "Life on Benefits Being Easier Than Working"

There are 551,000 more people unemployed than there are available jobs.  Clinicians are EXCEPTIONALLY resistant to the idea of providing routine medical appointments outside of working hours. Bus companies just shrug their shoulders as able-bodied mothers take over the lone wheelchair bay on each bus with their buggies, tourists yeet their wheeled suitcases into it, and bored teenagers sprawl there, because schools refuse to provide their own bus services, and bus companies are allowed to take more passengers than there are available seats. In the UK, there is an average of 37 reported hate crimes against disabled people every single day. That's an average of a crime against a disabled person every single hour of every single day. It's not an "epidemic of worklessness" - it's an epidemic of intolerance for anyone who isn't 100% "normal" and "on the ball" 100% of the time.  It's an epidemic of intolerance for any period of absence, and a...

The Great British Debt Crisis

                                            On Friday 20th September 2024, it was revealed that the UKā€™s national debt was equal to the income the UK was able to generate; in short, debt was at 100% of GDP. This last occurred in the 1960s - and resulted in the following decade, the 1970s, being extremely difficult for ordinary people, with standards of living declining sharply across all demographics, something which, inevitably, hit those who were already experiencing poverty the hardest. The 1970s saw a massive loss of manufacturing in Britain - historically, the one sector that had been able to pull Britain through the downturns of economic cycles, because the UK used to be known, and respected for, exceptional quality of its manufactured goods, and many countries around t...