Skip to main content

Can Pessimists Be Happy?

 

Image shows a smiley face drawn in sand.

Today is International Day of Happiness. We're The Productive Pessimist; those two things may seem to be completely at odds.  

Can pessimists be happy?  Isn't pessimism essentially a guarantee of lifelong discontent?

Pessimism is actually more likely to create a state of calm, enduring happiness, because pessimism prevents unrealistic expectations from being built into believable ambitions.

Pessimists have dreams, like everyone else, but they are grounded in a realism that has been subjected to often quite extreme analysis. Just because a dream doesn't make it through this analysis, it doesn't mean a pessimist can't or won't indulge it; sometimes, it can be pleasant to play with a dream which we know won't go anywhere - after all, if the dream is acknowledged as impossible, we can enjoy our ideal of it, without any risk of having to encounter the downsides which come with any dream.

Dreams which make it through a pessimist's analysis much more readily become goals - focused efforts, rather than passing diversions.

Diversions cheer us up. Focused efforts, even when we don't achieve them as we'd hoped, are what creates stable, enduring happiness.

The things which give me greatest happiness are the things I have had to work at;

. My marriage - which is a daily endeavour, requiring maintenance, attention to detail, self-sacrifice, and no small amount of lateral thinking.

. My writing - I haven't achieved the success I'd like with it yet, but I enjoy it for itself. I used to care about getting 'noticed', and, ideally, published - now, I don't. I work on making sure I'm saying something sensible, I work on presentation and tone, I work on other ways of presenting my thoughts.  And it's this aspect of work which brings happiness.

. My pets - I have several pets; dogs, cats, rabbits, birds, and a hamster.  All of them require a great deal of work to care effectively for them, and, in the dogs' case, to train them to be safe and acceptable in public. The work is often challenging, sometimes frustrating, but it's the work of having pets that means their presence makes me happy.

. My work - building The Productive Pessimist from very literal scratch is challenging. Often, it is challenging to the point of mental exhaustion. But, when I have work to do with The Productive Pessimist, I'm happy - very likely because of the challenges it presents.

There's also the fact that, because pessimists assume the worst, we notice and value the best when we experience it. Those who take for granted the fact that things will go well for them are often unhappy, because they assumed something which was causing them happiness would endure, and became frustrated when it ended - as passing things which make us happy always will.

Some pessimists are always unhappy - but not because they are pessimists. 

Most pessimists, like most people, can experience times of unhappiness.

Some pessimists never really feel either happy or unhappy - they exist in a state of unremarkable neutral.

How can Productive Pessimism improve happiness?

Productive Pessimism is a technique, a cognitive tool. As such, one of the ways it can be used is to improve your own happiness.

1. Identify whether you are unhappy, or discontent.
Unhappiness is an emotion - you feel it in your chest and stomach primarily.
Discontentment, in contrast, is a cognitive state - you feel it in your mind first, although it can spread to your chest and stomach.

2. If you are unhappy, then use the Productive Pessimism Process to identify why you are unhappy.
The Productive Pessimism Process:
a) State the feeling, then question it from several angles: eg; "I am unhappy.  Why am I unhappy?  How am I unhappy?  When did I start feeling unhappy? Where am I feeling the unhappiness most in my body?  What helps with/exacerbates the unhappiness?" Make notes of your answers, keeping the questions separate.
b) Question the answers to the questions from step a).
Eg; Answer to the question 'Why am I unhappy?' - 'I am unhappy because I'm struggling at work' - "What am I struggling with at work?  When did I first notice I was struggling?" Again, write down your answers - and make sure you question each of the answers from every part of step a).
c) Review your answers. Using different colours, or particular symbols, or whatever kind of system works for you, sort your answers to step b) into the following categories:
1. Things I can't influence
2. Things I can partly influence
3. Things that are fully within my control

Throw away everything that comes under column 1.
For the items in column 2, identify what support, resources, etc, you will need to have more influence.
Establish a plan for working through the remaining items, from column 3. Don't try and work on all of them at once - spread them over anything from 3 weeks to three years, depending on how many things you have on your list.

The Productive Pessimism Process provides you with focused work, which, as we've discussed, helps create happiness.  It reduces the number of things you have to worry about - which is known to improve happiness. It reaffirms your sense of competence and control, which has been proven to be central to ongoing happiness.

If you'd like guidance in working through The Productive Pessimism Process for your own life challenges, then your best option would be to book a 1hr consultation via email; this gives you three email exchanges for just £45 - one for each step of the process.  To book, simply email us - theproductivepessimist@yahoo.com


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Have We Reached The End of Growth?

  End of the road for economic growth in the UK? The UK government - and most Western European governments - hyperfixate on economic growth  as a measure of political success: If growth is strong, the claim goes, then the government of the day are doing things right, regardless of how popular their policies are with the public.  If growth slows, the government has clearly made the wrong decision, and needs to alter course, and prove that they deserve  to be in charge. This is something that has become a sacred truth in government.  "This will destroy  growth!"  "This risks crashing  UK growth prospects!" have become ever-more aggressive reactions to policy suggestions from opposing parties, or individual politicians.  Initially, I assumed this was deliberate fear-mongering; because the public associates "economic growth" with " my  individual life improving, me as an individual  having more money for less work, and everything gettin...

(Un)Packing the Punch: What People Mean When They Mock Equality

  "If women want equality, it's fine if I punch you, then?" "Why should I give up my seat for a pregnant woman? They wanted equality, after all!" "Equality means she  should be doing a proper day's work, too, not lounging around scrolling socials all day!" These are all common retorts against the equality that is legally enforced to the benefit of cisgender, able-bodied, mentally well women (and which is often more readily and fully given to white  women in those categories.) The perception of the Left is that this is "proof that men just want to be violent." And some men - and some women, and some non-binary folk - undoubtedly do. The possibility of being an objectionable piece of sh*t who wants to harm others, and make irresponsible choices, is a fundamental aspect of being human, which is why the consequences  of irresponsible and anti-social choices should never be weakened or removed. For many others, though, their discomfort with th...

What Happens When Growth Ends?

  The Bank of England is expressing significant concerns about Britain's "ageing and ailing workforce", harmonising to the government's tune of how the long-term sick are responsible for the UK economic challenges, and how "necessary" raising the State pension age is. Those two songs have been a more or less constant refrain from various shades of UK governments since 1997 - almost 30years.  Pretty much my whole life, and the entirety of my life as someone old enough to vote. Of course, work is necessary.  Countries have essential core services which require vast workforces to provide and administrate. Governments should be generating national income by exporting from the manufacturing, STEM, creative, and knowledge economy sectors, all of which require their own skilled and specialist workforces, and the workforce of their respective administrative and marketing functions. Continuous income, to cover the unavoidable payment lags in exports, is necessary fo...