Skip to main content

What's Wrong With You?


 One of my personal frustrations is when people or companies say they want a slice of an absolutely huge pie, that's showing itself very well in just about every class - eg, a business sector that's romping all over the board, and bringing in profits with barely any effort - but then seem to find any and every reason to take as long as possible actually getting round to even picking up a plate!

I go bodyboarding when I get the time. One of the key facts in that world is that, by the time EVERYONE is able to see a wave breaking, if you're not already riding it, it's too late.

The same is true in business.

Whether it's an individual or a company being a hesitant wallflower in the face of the ride of a lifetime, the motivation seems to be the same: they'll waste time on business cases, business plans, and, if they're an organisation, corporate governance.

The prevailing attitude, certainly in the UK, often seems to be that business cases and business plans have to cover and answer every possible question, to the fullest possible extent, so that the proposal "just gets waved through" when it goes before the bank manager, or the Board.

Pro tip: the only questions you need to answer immediately are:
. How much is this actually going to cost? (purchase price, maintenance costs while momentum builds, overheads - eg, staff wages, holiday pay, sick pay, accommodations and adaptations for staff with disabilities, vehicles, stock, marketing, networking, your own salary...)
. How long are you going to give it before you accept it hasn't worked out the way you planned, and either a) change the plan, or b) exit the sector?
. What do you need to have the best chance of success?
. What do you bring that can enhance the sector?
. How are you going to ensure that accessibility and inclusion are designed-in, rather than an adjustment that needs to be made later?

That's it. Five questions.  

My advice? Task 5 individuals, or 5 groups (depending on the size of your organisation or community) with answering a question each, and then come together to discuss how the answers link in to each other.

Give a MAXIMUM of an hour to each question.

Then spend a maximum of two hours with everyone working together to tell the story of what your first day, your first week, your first six months, your first year will look like.  This is just a story; it's broad brush strokes.  Tell it as though it's already happened, Eg;

"Our first day was a really energising community engagement experience; we made sure we'd created an attractive layout, that highlighted key offerings at a range of price points, and made sure our site (physical or virtual) was fully accessible, a genuinely inclusive and safe space, and easy to navigate. We weren't actively selling, we were just talking to people, and letting them get a proper look at what we're offering.

Our first week started quietly, but this gave us time to notice what caused people to stop and linger, so that we could optimise our offering. We also had quality conversations, which, towards the end of the week, we saw result in effective word of mouth marketing.

Our first six months was a steady growth in trade volume, with a constant receptiveness to feedback - for example, one of our most common complaints was: "I couldn't find the checkout button!" - we looked at our website, and realised that we needed to add a checkout button to our product thumbnails, to benefit from the initial "oohh, I like that! I want one!" - people weren't unable to find the checkout button, they got bored with the product descriptions we were so proud of, and had put so much time into, and left - those descriptions help with SEO (we can see this from our stats), but the checkout button needs to come before them so that the process works for people as well as algorithms.

Our first year was a process of continuous improvement - small changes in response to the actual problems behind customer moans, eg: "You're too expensive" actually means "I don't perceive any value to me from these products/services", so we need to look at what we're actually providing our customer - convenience? Comfort? A sense of 'being a socially responsible person?' A belief that they are taking control of their own health outcomes? A reward for surviving a challenging week? - and make that value clearer.  We slowly built up a regular customer base, and were open to dynamic insights on what worked and what didn't. We've created a business we can grow at minimal cost, and which is ready to change to meet consumer demand and sector challenges, whilst still maintaining a recognisable, core identity."  (It took me 35mins to come up with that. 2hrs will give you something epic.)

This story, paired with the answers to the five questions above, give you your business plan.

Governance, be it a Board or a bank manager, isn't about getting "waved through, because you answered all our questions" - good governance is about proactive support. Governance is about asking the pertinent questions you haven't thought of, it's about making you aware of threats you may not have seen.  It's about showing you that you have a purely objective team in the background, ready to pull you out if you start sinking.  To return to surfing/bodyboarding terms, your governance team are the jetski riders who circle in the background while you're doing your stuff. They're the people who can act quickly when things swamp you, and the people who can call the rescue helicopter when you get wiped out, and can't recover.

Governance bods and Boards: BE that support crew.
Call out where the best waves are before they start to break.
Direct your folk away from dangerously crowded spots, to the places they can do their best stuff.
Keep an eye on them.
Get them out if they're swamped.
Call for rescue if a wipe out leaves them helpless.

Don't have a Governance team that's on your side, and feel like you'd like one?

The Productive Pessimist offers Governance in its best form, at £45 per hour or £300 per day.

Drop us an email to talk about what you need. theproductivepessimist@yahoo.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What Your Boss (and HR) Say When They Think You're Not In the Room

  Today, I attended a webinar on "Capability and Ill-health in the Workplace".  It was hosted by a corporate insurer who provides HR consultancy services. Those attending were business leaders and HR representatives, and the Q&A at the end made it clear they believed they were only in a "room" with other  leaders and HR reps. Their attitudes around long-term ill health and disability were immediately presented as: . This is an intolerable and ridiculous burden to us as employers . This is too expensive . These people are taking the piss . It's not going to be fair to able-bodied people who have to pick up their slack. This is also the attitude I've personally, directly  encountered as someone trying to work whilst also being disabled.  It's the attitude that lost me my last job - a job I mostly enjoyed, and a role I'd hoped to build a career from. Employers. HATE. Disabled. And. Chronically. Ill.  Employees. They do not  want to employ disabled p...

Forget Retirement Planning, and Turn to Honour Planning

  The current trend of advice and focus, particularly financial advice and focus, is "sacrifice, go all in on work, work, work, save and invest through your 20s and 30s, which is the best decades of your life  for compound growth! so you can have an absolutely amazing retirement, with enough money to do everything you want, and not worry  about money, because there won't be social security!" This feeds into a wider toxic focus of positioning work as "the thing that exists in opposition to the life we deserve  to live."  In reality, work is part of  life.  Retirement  is actually the thing that exists in opposition to life. The vision that's being sold is "if you sacrifice all fun and socialising, and just grind through your 20s and 30s, you'll get to have this wonderful, rewarding retirement" - but the reality is, many of us will not be in good enough health by the time we reach our 60s or 70s to actually do  much of anything.  Many of u...

How Do I Treat Trans Staff Following the Supreme Court's Ruling?

  The Supreme Court's recent ruling that "woman" refers to "someone who was biologically female at birth" only directly connects to roles specifically reserved for women , which have to follow a specific process to authorise gender exclusion against men.  It does not  mean "I want my organisation to be female-dominant, so I don't have to employ trans women anymore!"  Nor does it mean that you "aren't allowed" to continue respecting the gender - and names and pronouns - of trans people who currently work for you, and those you "don't think look like women" - who probably actually aren't  trans. For Boards, who are being legally obliged towards demonstrating equity, the real diversity is diversity of approach.   Here at The Productive Pessimist , we work very much in alignment with Leandro Herrero 's style of management - and very much agree with his statement: "If you have two people who think exactly the sam...